WHO THINKS A PLACE WITH A WAR OFFERS A BETTER QUALITY OF LIFE? A very close relative of mine just relocated to Sri Lanka because the quality of life there is better for that person. Sri Lanka is of course a place that has had a war type situation for the last 20 years or so. Granted, it is not widespread, mostly limited to the north, but still, how can a place that has a freakin' WAR/armed conflict going on be better than the most productive & one of the wealthiest, most free, and safest countries on the history of this planet; the US of A? I guess it all depends on what you use as your criteria to figure out which place provides a better quality of life. Living in Sri Lanka is certainly far cheaper. A person can live comfortably in Sri Lanka for about $200 a month. That's right, two hundred dollars a month. And if you are from that culture or immersed in that culture and a big fan of it, then there is probably no place better. ONE POSSIBLE PROBLEM WITH SUCCESS Livin...
Intro to an epic new indie film project - 53 scripted fiction features in
53 months - finally!
-
*
Other indie film stuff:
*
An ad/arthouse film discussion:
2 weeks ago