Skip to main content

Yeah, looks like I will have to read Youth Without Youth before watching the movie & then repeat to get it

While working at the bookstore - the day job - I've leisurely shelved (took a while to leaf through the books before shelving them) books by Mircea Eliade and even bought a couple of books by him; dude was deeply into philosophy, linguistics, and religion (even though I have not re-read it in at least three years, I still remember an interpretation of the Buddhist concept of Nirvana by Eliade - it talked about being able to step outside of experiencing the ordinary flow of time in a very significant way; granted, I do not clearly know what that means, but it was memorable because most books on Buddhism do not analyze or talk about exactly what happened during the nirvana experience).

Since, as a novelist, Eliade (read bio below) was most likely no hack - a writer pulling together a bunch of exotic ideas in order to merely entertain - I am thinking that maybe there are some valuable ideas behind the very complex story of Coppola's movie version of Eliade's book Youth Without Youth. Check out Emanuel Levy's review of the movie; it has a pretty detailed summary of the plot. But by the time I was done reading it, I was kind of lost (maybe I just need more coffee :). Anyway, if you too feel the need to read Youth Without Youth in order to make sense of the movie, here's the Amazon link for the book. Looking forward to watching Youth, as most movies are too easy to figure out and are kind of dull & predictable, Youth might actually be a complex, challenging & rewarding experience.

And here's info. on Eliade's life & work, from American Zoetrope's website for Youth:

"Micea Eliade (1907 - 1986)

Romanian-born historian of religion, Eliade was one of the pre-eminent interpreters of world religion in the 20th century. An intensely prolific author of fiction and non-fiction alike, Eliade published 1,300 pieces over 60 years. He earned international fame with LE MYTHE DE L' ÉTERNAL RETOUR (The Myth of the Eternal Return), an interpretation of religious symbols and imagery, while his four volume History of Religious Ideas is considered one of the most comprehensive resources on major religious traditions.

Mircea Eliade began his life in Bucharest, Romania March 9, 1907. Eliade's father, an army officer, changed the family name from Ieremia to Eliade due to his admiration for the writer Eliade-Radulescu. The name change proved prophetic, as Eliade exhibited a passion for writing. A true auto-didactic mind, he was known to sleep only 5 - 6 hours a night to maximize his time for edifying interests like entomology, linguistics, alchemy, Orientalism, religion, literary criticism, and his own short stories.

In 1925, Eliade entered The University of Bucharest, where he pursued studies in Renaissance philosophy. In 1928, Eliade expanded on his Western education by sailing to Calcutta to study Sanskrit and Eastern philosophies until 1931. Calcutta forever changed Eliade and directed his passion for knowledge towards the study of religious history. PhD work and teaching history of religion and metaphysics in Bucharest followed. Besides diplomatic duties during WWII, Eliade remained in academia teaching and publishing, first at The Sorbonne in Paris and then at The University of Chicago where he was the Sewall L. Avery Distinguished Service Professor at the Divinity School and professor in the Committee on Social Thought. Eliade's breadth of religious knowledge was unparalleled and led him to several pioneering conclusions about the nature of religious cultures. His essays The Myth of the Eternal Return (1945) and The Sacred and the Profane (1959) secured Eliade's reputation as an eminent religious scholar and are considered seminal works in comparative religion. Using his fund of knowledge, Eliade passionately insists on the value of understanding primitive religious cultures in order to enrich our contemporary imagination of what it is to be human and sacred.

Eliade also wrote autobiographical works as well as novels, novellas, short stories, and plays. He approached fiction as a complimentary way to creatively explore the themes of his scholarly work. He often used devices of fantasy and the occult to create hidden worlds behind everyday reality. He believed imagination was essential to understanding the sacred in life. Also, erotic love was often a central theme in his fiction. Many of his stories are rooted in personal experience, and were written as a way to transcend the profane and find true meaning in his own life."

- Sujewa

Full Movie - SNEAK PREVIEW - Cosmic Disco Detective Rene And The Mystery Of Immortal Time Travelers

NEW - COSMIC DISCO DETECTIVE RENE (2023) - TRAILER!

The Secret Society For Slow Romance (2022) - available to rent as a new release starting January 1

Werewolf Ninja Philosopher at Vimeo VOD

Popular Posts

Godard's GOODBYE TO LANGUAGE - watch and commentary live - off of Metrograph At Home copy of film

Let's take a closer look at Mike Tully's negative review of IFBRT & see if we can clarify some things

Mike Tully (presently inactive filmmaker who is not a fan of shooting on DV, who is now running things - as far as I know - at the review site Hammer to Nail, who also blogs at indieWIRE, & who wrote a brief & positive review of Date Number One in '06, & a fellow Marylander who generally seems like a cool dude) attended the World Premiere of Indie Film Blogger Road Trip and wrote a review of the doc . There are several items in that review that I'd like to comment on. So here we go: "At its best, Sujewa Ekanayake’s Indie Film Blogger Road Trip is certain to go down as one of the more bizarre time capsules of life on early-21st Century Earth." Cool - life on Earth in early 21st century - right now - is pretty bizarre, so a film dealing with a new, early-21st Century thing like film blogging/a film blogging community, should reflect that reality. The doc, however, is very simple & conventional in its form & content (shots of people talking). It is i

This is no way to write a movie review

Cynthia Rockwell's "review" of Hannah Takes The Stairs is depressing not because she didn't like the movie but because after reading the entire thing, 6 small to medium sized paragraphs, I can't figure out the following: the plot of the movie or the situation or roughly what happens for 70 - 90 minutes, the main characters & any significant minor characters, who plays the characters, ideas that may have been expressed in the movie, similar ideas and situations that may have been explored in other movies or other art/entertainment and how those compare with the film being reviewed, the reviewer's opinion of the technical craftsmanship of the movie, how real life compares to the world being depicted in the movie. At the very least I would like to learn a few of those things about a movie from a review. (and yes, Rockwell does consider her post re: Hannah a review, as noted here , not just a blog entry reflecting on the lack of female participation in indie

Reading Material

Indie Film Blogger Road Trip